When Horror Meets Mental Health: This Way Lies Madness, edited by Dave Jeffery & Lee Murray
A Horror Book Review by Benjamin Kurt Unsworth.
From the very first moments of the submissions call, what editors Dave Jeffery & Lee Murray wanted to do was tell tales which shine a light on mental health without stigma or invective language. As such – not least because they wholeheartedly succeed in their task, incidentally – I shall be writing something about every story featured; it feels only right given the subject matter.
They are of course fabulous writers in their own right, both featuring on my âTop 10 Short Stories of 2024â list – and Iâm happy to say that theyâre great editors too. An intriguing, honourable aspect of the anthology is the set of notes at the end of each story where the author divulges the lived experience which fuelled their tale. Itâs entirely symptomatic of their personalities, kind-hearted and nurturing before all else, but it also makes the anthology stand out because thereâs never the suggestion theyâre doing this merely to put money in a pocket.
The first author featured is Kayleigh Dobbs whose tale âTBRâ I imagine most people in writing circles shall empathise with intensely. The premise itself is very simple, asking what the thoughts of a book constantly at the bottom of a TBR pile are. The answer? Jealousy.
Like every story collected here, the writing is intelligent and adroit and story as a whole is a nice segue into the overall anthology, slight and unassuming and driven by emotion instead of blood. In essence, horror that isnât really horror, more an attempt to pull at your emotional cords like a bell-ringer does the ropes in a belfry. The majority of the narrative is in fact a romance of sorts, waiting until its final few pages before flirting with blood. Perhaps ironically, it pummels you increasingly like a series of paper cuts as opposed a punch to the face, yet the impact is fervid to the same degree.
Moreover, as the anthologyâs first blood, it functions as an admirable exemplar of what Jeffery & Murray are curating; the horrors are a metaphor for a unstigmatised facet of mental health, in Dobbsâ case both the feeling of rejection and emotional abuse.
Jonathan Maberry is next up, the focus of his evocatively-named âThe Scarlet Angels of Regretâ being obstinacy and the danger of single-mindedness, all told via a narrative involving a boy badly-named Osgood Poppleton, his various machinations, and the ghosts of a kind which come in his wake. From its first paragraph onwards, a clever nausea bubbles up through the tale and it unlocks horrors born of discomfort and subtle pessimism.
Due to how Poppletonâs various schemes possess a Machiavellian allure, heâs a character you could easily see demanding an entire novel to himself – and so itâs maybe best for humanity, fictional or otherwise, that he doesnât. As a tragic villain he deserves sympathy for the exact same reason he doesnât and a true strength of Maberryâs story is how he plays about with that.
A slight caveat on your enjoyment might be that you arenât always sure whether the story is being comedic, satirical, or blunt; however the three tones overlap enough that more often than not the whiplash between them keeps you alert and almost sparring with the story. The haziness connecting the various tones and intensities adds a layer of mistrust to the narrative, pipetting the mistrust youâd expect from an unreliable 1st person narrator into the omnipotent 3rd person.
With âBangsâ comes the first author on the contents page I was before now unfamiliar with: Emily Ruth Verona. I suppose the greatest accolade I can award this tale is that it made me immediately put the anthology down, go to tâinternet, and ordered myself a copy of her novel âMidnight on Beacon Streetâ. The other is that I nearly didnât finish it; not because it was bad though, the very opposite. A whack-a-mole of sensory horrors, it struck every nerve and exploited everything Iâm squeamish about.
It also put me firmly in mind of the 2024 horror film THE SUBSTANCE. While they say comparison is the thief of joy, I take it as a good sign – thereâs a reason it made me feel so uncomfortable and that was because it captured what made my favourite film of last year so fabulous.
Veronaâs story plays out across its humble length as a mental monologue between a girl and the face she looks at in the mirror – harmless, right? Wrong! What you get treated to is a microcosm of beauty standards gone wrong, everything you might fear from unfettered body dysmorphia flung into your mindâs eye with no chance to renege. I canât ever say Iâve suffered from body dysmorphia, but the shell-shock cultivated here makes me feel like I have.Â
If thereâs one other accolade I can give to âBangsâ, itâs that it made a brief microcosm in someoneâs life feel like a full-throated death knell. This will be on my end-of-year âTop 10 Short Storiesâ.
Stephen Volkâs âSawn Wifeâ is up next, and yes, this does involve a woman-is-sawn-in-half illusion going wrong. Sort of. This is far more Freudian, far more tragic, far more cyclothymic, and a little less Joan Crawford in BERSERK!. Alongside his usual wit and an attitude balancing the two sides of cynicism, Volk adds comedy and a situation which is either necrophilia, an advanced state of emotional abuse, or (most likely) both. Somehow, itâs also an mildly intractable tale, where the apogee and perigee of the storyâs tones and styles clash diabolically and deliberately in every paragraph.
While source seems far removed from the mind which gave us GHOSTWATCH and MIDWINTER OF THE SPIRIT, its voice is nonetheless cinematic. The visuals it evokes either via suggestion or outlandish description are moreish in their macabre nature. A definite Chetwynd-Hayes element even pokes through and prods you with caustic characters, the ridiculous and sublime coming together splendidly. Plus, the epilogue is a recreative excerpt from the diary of a certain 19th-century Russo-Ukrainian author – what isnât to like?
Next is a duo of tales, Cynthia Pelayoâs âSelf Portraitâ and Grace Chanâs âThe Markâ, neither of which I entirely know how to process. In both cases, they seem to owe a literary debt of some sort (although into her narrative Chan imbues a quality which wouldnât be amiss in a Buttgereit exploitation film); the former is a âPicture of Dorian Grayâ for the twenty-first century but with more liminality and a restless and inward viewpoint as disconcerting as it is compelling, whereas the latter feels far more explicit, a hybrid between Clive Barker-esque body horror and King Jamesâ âDĂŚmonologieâ inverted into being a feminist fog horn.
These two stories – and this is testament to Jeffery & Murray for their position in the anthology – have a certifiably female voice and emotional intelligence. However, thereâs also something probing about the stories. The liminality detracts a little, since the lack of concrete ideas to latch onto might infuriate some, but the fact they both resolutely refuse to answer any questions is mostly advantageous.
As with the Pelayo/Chan duo, the following two stories make an excellent duo given the way they lock the reader into the storiesâ driving seat – Freddie Bonfantiâs âPoppetâ and Sayan J. Soselisaâs âDissolution of the Self on the Altar of Your Dreams: A Case Studyâ.
Bonfanti writes likely the most traditional story of the anthology, but donât mistake that for meaning itâs quotidian. Thereâs a cutting, vampiric edge to it which you donât anticipate until itâs too late and thereâs a harmony between the tone here and the kind of paranoia-meets-apocalypse genre the 1970s specialised in. At least in narrative, Soselisaâs story is vastly different – and it gains points from moment one by referencing my favourite Cronenberg film. Somewhat more explicit than Bonfantiâs story without necessarily becoming exploitation, Soselisa throws you into a mad doctor story (which also couldâve launched straight out of the 70s) with a beautifully bizarre twist bolted onto it.
What unites these two then is the 2nd person narrator; neither author gives you a choice except to feel like the yoke has been fixed to your shoulders and by forcing you into the storyâs emotional centre you feel the various horrors are their strongest. There are horror elements to both stories besides this, but the fervour of the voice which both authors beat you with is surprisingly fierce on its own.
C. D. VĂĄzquez then contributes his debut short story âCalm Springsâ to the anthology, not that it reads like that. A Lovecraftian entity and generalised anxiety are, respectively, the villain and underlying theme and they pair nicely; a very simpatico relationship builds throughout the story between them both, a morose quality infecting most of the characters in spite of the graphic descriptions interspersed around them.
While not necessarily claustrophobic, the overarching scenario of people trapped in a bus heading to the idyllic Calm Springs – or are they? – has a creepy and instinctively dissociated quality. Theyâre characters like you and me, whether you can instantly empathise with or not, and the pungency of something soul-rending, like a lost TWILIGHT ZONE episode let loose in more fragile, less Manichaean contexts.Â
Taking the anthology into the realms of sci fi, parasitic aliens, and reality fraying at every available seam are a small team of astronauts in Callum Rowlandâs âThe Soup of Lifeâ. The turn towards sci fi is an effective – albeit out of the blue – tonal shift for the anthology; those aspects, whether deliberately or not, actually deliver a harder impact than the horror ones here.
While premise itself is hardly original, I suspect it doesnât have to be; at its core this is driven by emotion, journaling the collapse of someoneâs mind, as opposed to by plot. Thereâs a bittersweet quality by the time the story wraps up which adds a retroactive, gravelly quality and helps the story properly hit the spot; its concessions towards positivity become more like lifelines and its darker elements suddenly have an isolating ambience all of their own.
One of the most impactful pieces of non-fiction Iâve ever read was the introduction to Ramsey Campbellâs novel âThe Face That Must Dieâ. Itâs horrifying as it is insightful into mental health issues, a horror short in its own right. The tales Campbell tells of his mother are, I imagine, the closest we shall ever get to understanding his powerhouse of a brain.
âA Solitary Voiceâ, as he touches upon in the author note, exploits that part of his past; itâs a âday in the lifeâ story of sorts gaining unintended consequences as a woman tries to fight off physical pain and her mental pain worsens. As youâd expect from one of the Masters of Horror, this is pure nightmare fuel, the frustrating made terrifying, the dialogue made irresistible, and the striations between reality and fiction made powerful no where you are in the story.
To anyone who argues with themselves and has an inner dialogue as opposed to just a monologue, Campbellâs story offers you the calm in the eye of the storm – which is, of course, where the true horrors live.
Amanda Cecelia Langâs story âNothing and the Boyâ is a story I canât really say much about without giving its central horror away. My immediate impression was actually not of a horror story though (although it certainly is one!), but rather âThe Boy, The Mole, The Fox and the Horseâ transformed into something with greater levels of woe and metafiction. The impression doesnât necessarily last for long, but suffice to say the overall story is dynamic and impactful throughout; it gives you characters and ideas living in the liminal, through which Langâs prose acts like some hypnotic spirit guide.
Alma Katsu picks up the baton next with her story, âThe Familiarâs Assistantâ. This might include a vampire, but fear not – itâs a vastly different fanged (yet similarly great) beast to Bonfantiâs contribution. While it would likely fall almost slap bang in the middle of any hypothetical Katsu short story ranking I did, she nevertheless brings well rounded characters to the table and paints relationships deftly and intriguingly but with a iron-clad humanity in both the logic and illogic.
It reminded me of a Rachel Harrison story, in that sense. You get an nice exploration of the abuser/abuser relationship and also the vicissitudes of tying yourself in mental knots – that it doesnât quite manage the sting you want doesnât belie the storyâs overall zest for character and flavoursome emotion.
âWe Donât Talk About the Sinkâ by Ryan Cole is next, and itâs one Iâm in two minds over. Because I really enjoyed it. The premise is good – focusing on someone trying to protect their brother from the creature in the sink, an obvious but pertinent metaphor for eating disorders – Coleâs style has natural balance of charm and anger.
However, there are two tones going on in the story and you canât help but wonder if youâre missing something because of that. Itâs like a mild whiplash as you adjust to how it flicks between the fantastical, childlike false reality and the serious, brooding one. The plot is always understandable though and manages to be very scary, even when the metaphor subsumes it a little.
âOld Friendsâ by Tim Waggoner is up next. Waggoner delivers a simple tale, but it has a short, sharp power hiding beneath it, the trenchancy of his prose quietly and effectively pinpricking you with a sense of dolour. One thing in particular which struck me was how it subverted the genre, inhabiting neither William Peter Blatty nor Peter Tremblayâs brand of exorcisms. As with a lot of the stories here, should you want a narrative where the real life voice bleeds through like an irrepressible wound you can do far worse than this. For all its grittiness, youâre never uncertain about where the emotional core is.
Sara Larner is next with her story âA Note for William Cowperâ, taking you on a deep sea submarine mission gone horribly wrong. Told through the format of a transcribed audio, this is one of the anthologyâs most âpage-turningâ romps â and despite its dark, depressing nature it truly is a romp, as easy to devour as it is gut-wrenching!
Because it is an emotional pressure cooker from beginning to end, Larnerâs prose has an energetic quality, bombilating with both fieriness and honed romance. The equilibrium she finds between aquatic Donner Party and luridly descriptive ocean adventure works especially well. Moreover, while poetry ordinarily has to be quite special for me to take to it (on which more later), the way Larner syncs it with this tale I found undoubtedly effective.
Next is âThereâs a Ghost in My Houseâ, written by Marie OâRegan. Youâd think a doctor visiting a patient would only be frightening in so many ways? Oh no! This eschews all these and OâReganâs lightness of touch throws some dark ideas and visceral punches at you.
Her story contains, among other terrors, paranoia, the macabre realisation of Cotardâs syndrome, violence, ghosts, and – worst of all – the most disorientating description of someone eating a biscuit ever. Her humour is a nice touch too, playing the âIf you donât laugh youâll cryâ card well, and though how the characters manifest might at first prove a little annoying for those used to quicker, blunter shocks – as you cannot always be sure why the ambiguity is there – when the clarity comes and she draws the tendrils into a fully-fledged creature you feel its horror palpably.Â
But the strongest element OâRegan cultivates is the characterisation of everything as a disease. Neither overtly clinical nor overtly nauseous, the overall approach feels like a determined character dissection. You get the impression very little is isolated; some exploitative, dare I say parasitical, vortex is at the centre and pulling the strings. And while the ending isnât quite the twist it maybe thinks it is, there are enough pustules of emotion or enmity around it that the result still creates both shock and severity.
âThe Book of Dreemsâ by Georgina Bruce takes the anthology into the realms of fantasy, and – personal preference here – Iâll be honest and say that wasnât really my thing. I like the idea that dolls are a metaphor for male control over women, but Iâd argue actually having it as a fairytale âbreaksâ that because it makes the metaphor far too blunt and and connecting emotionally to the character becomes a struggle. Not to say itâs badly written or constructed either – the labyrinthine element is one I like – but if it were gritty, perhaps Lovecraftian drama, itâd have appealed more greatly.
With âThe Dark Gets Inâ, Sean Hogan writes a very introspective, almost subverted J. G. Ballard tale, which translates itself onto the page like a conversation with an old friend. Sometimes old friends are reliable; sometimes they scare you witless; and sometimes you wish theyâd never entered your life in the first place.
I imagine that if the Public Information Films of âSpirit of Dark and Lonely Waterâ fame ever saw a revival, and letâs be honest they kind of did in the form of Boris Johnsonâs broadcasts to the nation during the COVID Lockdowns (which was when Hogan wrote this story), this is how theyâd manifest. A conversation with the viewer (and here, reader). Flavours of paranoia and fear delivered across the nation and also straight into your psyche.
Knowing Hoganâs love of meta-tales, itâs nice to see him going full-pelt angst and direct-to-the-reader as opposed to penning Christopher Leeâs Duc de Richleau and Niall McGinnisâs Julian Karswell finding themselves involved with Antichrist. Donât get me wrong, I adore those tales, but thereâs an ice-cold isolation here which I doubt youâd get in a story brought about by a bigger universe. The events of the story of ramifications, but Hogan delivers them with a quiet temerity and ability to make you feel victimised by the tale simply by reading it. Under Hoganâs pen, the dark certainly gets in – and exerts squatter rights before you can beseech it to leave.
âEighty-Five Per Cent, Give or Takeâ by Alan Baxter is the anthologyâs final prose contribution and itâs one heck of a gut-wrench. While Baxterâs prose is nothing especially provocative, you get the innate sense itâs holding back a dam of raw power, like a staring contest with an unstable Jenga tower being dared not to topple. The âDay in the lifeâ narrative looks at its two main characters, one of whom is recovering from surgery where only 85% of his body (âgive or takeâ) has been, and the somewhat aimless plot connected with that works surprisingly well. Everything, from tension to exposed character flaws, just builds – and itâs scary not having a trajectory to sense where it might stop.
Apropos of the mental health aspect, it focuses on the friend having undergone surgery and the black cloud hanging round him ever since. Sidestepping the more obvious INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS route, Baxterâs approach to the story focuses on the personality disruption mental health problems can cause and the echoes of the storyâs inner cogs reverberate with little regard for your sanity. For the record, I reckon this would make either a wonderfully intense short film or the nihilistic middle third in an anthology film.
In addition to the prose stories of the anthology, sprinkled through are three poems by L. E. Daniels, Sumiko Saulson, and Stephanie Wytovich. As someone who isnât naturally drawn to poetry, I possibly wasnât the ideal audience for these three and Iâll admit to feeling a slight urgency to getting back to the prose contributions However!
Danielsâ poem âSpeakâ explores the implications of living with a stutter in a very tangible way and itâs telling that as much horror can be drawn from pure frustrations as from blood and guts; Saulsonâs poem âMy Ghosts Have Dreamâ is a deliberately delirious feast, and while I think that a hazard of the poems here is their brevity, the macabre and tragic air that Saulson evokes has a potency; and in the case of Wytovichâs âThe Carouselâ thereâs a kind of reverse body horror weaved in to the poem which makes it intriguing and the subtext of PTSD and BPD is definitely evident if not always firing its potential for horror at full cylinders.
Suffice to say, thereâs something there for the poem uninitiated like myself, even if I did find myself wishing they were longer so I could have a better chance at getting to grips with the garden of messages they are clearly and cleverly acuminating.Â
Ultimately, itâs a powerhouse of an anthology and any possible missteps are to do with personal preference than any outright flaws. Even if you can argue thereâs a loose tassel or two on this magic carpet, a loose tassel is by no means a bad one. As a whole the anthology undoubtedly fits the bill of Flame Treeâs âBeyond & Withinâ to a T (to âpresent a wide range of diverse and inclusive voices [with] an emphasis on the supernatural, science fiction, the mysterious and the speculativeâ). With Dave Jeffery & Lee Murray at the helm the heart and delicacy of their editing is on full display and guiding you along like some all-embracing religious figurehead.
Thereâs the unofficial rule that anthologists tend to place their favourite stories at the beginning and end of an anthology in order to ensure the opening salvo, middle, and denouement keep up the adrenaline, vivacity, and all-round panache; I highly doubt this case here, however. On most counts, every story holds their own and possesses a sagacity that ensures the entire anthology stays brilliant.
A second volume… when?
This Way Lies Madness, edited by Dave Jeffery & Lee Murray
In the tradition of Poeâs ‘The Tell-tale Heart’, This Way Lies Madness presents fictional interpretations of madness from some of the biggest names in the horror genre â an anthology of dark stories featuring monstrous manifestations of trauma and guilt, paranoia and persecution, anxiety, addiction, and crippling terror. With each contributor giving a unique introduction exploring their inspiration for their bone-chilling tale, This Way Lies Madness will provide a creative benchmark for writers, and challenge mental health stigma, awaken understanding, and offer hope to readers through the lens of horror fiction.
A mix of commissioned authors and stories selected from a hugely popular submissions call, the full list of featured authors in this book is: Alan Baxter, Freddie Bonfanti, Georgina Bruce, Ramsey Campbell, Grace Chan, Ryan Cole, L.E. Daniels, Kayleigh Dobbs, Sean Hogan, Alma Katsu, Amanda Cecelia Lang, Sara Larner, Jonathan Maberry, Marie OâRegan, Cynthia Pelayo, Callum Rowland, Sumiko Saulson, Sayan J. Soselisa, C.D. VĂĄzquez, Emily Ruth Verona, Stephen Volk, Tim Waggoner, and Stephanie M. Wytovich.
The Flame Tree Beyond and Within short story collections bring together tales of myth and imagination by modern and contemporary writers, carefully selected by anthologists, and sometimes featuring short stories from a single author. Overall, the series presents a wide range of diverse and inclusive voices with myth, folkloric-inflected short fiction, and an emphasis on the supernatural, science fiction, the mysterious and the speculative. The books themselves are gorgeous, with foiled covers, printed edges and published only in hardcover editions, offering a lifetime of reading pleasure.
Horror Book Reviews on Ginger Nuts of Horror
For fans of horror literature, The Ginger Nuts of Horror website is an essential destination that should not be overlooked. This platform offers a dedicated horror book review section that caters specifically to the needs of horror enthusiasts. With its unique blend of insightful critiques, expert recommendations, and a vibrant community, the site serves as a treasure trove for anyone seeking their next spine-chilling read.
One of the standout features of the horror book review section is its diversity. Readers can discover everything from classic horror novels to contemporary indie gems, ensuring that thereâs something for everyone. Each review is thoughtfully penned, providing not just a summary but also a deep dive into the themes, writing style, and overall atmosphere of the works. This allows readers to gauge whether a particular book aligns with their preferences.
For those passionate about horror literature, checking out this section is a must!
